MUKESH SINGH S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15447/2025 · 2026-01-29
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19916 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19916 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4220] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15447/2025 Mukesh Singh S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o Village Rithora Khurd, Post Gauspur, Thana Saraichhola, District Morena, Madhya Pradesh. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh, Adv. and Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh, Astt. Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 29/01/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.500/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offences under Sections 303(2) of BNS and Section 29 and 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and Section 41 and 42 of the Rajasthan Forest Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the petitioner has sold the said vehicle way back through agreement to sale to Ramprakash and at the relevant time the petitioner was not in the possession of the vehicle and the same was recovered at the place of incident. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to
[2026:RJ-JP:4220] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15447/2025] cooperate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not required and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application and submitted the factual report. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence and there is dispute with regard to ownership/ possession of the said vehicle, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner-Mukesh Singh S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, in connection with FIR No.500/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India
[2026:RJ-JP:4220] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15447/2025] without previous permission of the court. (iv) that the petitioner would submit his Mobile phones and Sim Cards before the concerned Investigating Officer. (v) that the accused-petitioner would submit his contact details along with the present address to the concerned Investigating Officer.
In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned Investigating Officer. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-235