Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19915 (KAR)

SRI GANGADHARAIAH v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/3555/2012 · 2026-06-03

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25908 WP No. 3555 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 3555 OF 2012 (SCST) BETWEEN: SRI. GANGADHARAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS, 1(a) SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, 1(b) SMT. D.G.SOWBHAGYA, D/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, 1(c) D.G.NEELAMBIKE, D/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, 1(d) SMT. D.G.VEESHALAKSHI D/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, 1(e) SMT. NALEENA KUMARI, D/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, ALL ARE R/AT DEVARAYAPATTANA VILLAGE, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN- 572104 AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER ORDER DATED 25.10.2019 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.N. MADHUSUDHAN &., SRI. RAGHAVENDRA.H.S, ADVOCATES ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25908 WP No. 3555 of 2012 AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR. 2. ASST. COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB DIVISION, TUMKUR. 3. SRI KARADI THIMMAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT DEVARAYAPATTANA, TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT 3(a) SRI. NAGARAJ, S/O LATE KARADI THIMMAIAH AGED MAJOR 3(b) SMT. SIDDAGANGA, S/O LATE KARADI THIMMAIAH AGED MAJOR 3(c) SRI. KUMBAIAH, S/O LATE KARADI THIMMAIAH AGED MAJOR 3(d) SMT. RANGAMMA D/O LATE KARADI THIMMAIAH AGED MAJOR AMENDEDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER ORDER DATED 18.01.2023 4. SRI CHIKKANNA S/O KARADI CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT DEVARAYAPATTANA, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25908 WP No. 3555 of 2012 TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT 5. KEMPAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS 5(a) GANGAMMA, W/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 5(b) SURESH, S/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 5(c) NARASIMHAMURTHY, S/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 5(d) NAGARAJU, S/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, THE RESPONDENT NO. 5(a) to 5 (d) ARE R/AT. DEVRAYAPATTANA, TUMKURU TALUK, TUMAKUTU DISTRICT AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER ORDER DATED 23.11.2024 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA.N, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. T.M.MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE TO R3(a) , V/O DATED 25.02.2020- NOTICE TO R3 (b) & (d) and R5 (a) & (d) ARE HELD SUFFICIENT; R4 & R5(b), R5 (c) SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 24.09.2010 IN PTCL NO.3/2006-07 AS PER ANNEXURE K.DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25908 WP No. 3555 of 2012 CONDUCT FRESH ENQUIRY AFTER ISSUING FRESH NOTICES TO THE PARTIES AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEAING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no instruction to go on with the matter and he is unable to contact the petitioners and there is no response to the notice sent to the petitioners by him in this regard. 2. In the light of the above submission, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19