ARB.P. 592/2026 $~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010134272026 + ARB.P. 592/2026 RYSN INFRA LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw and Ms. Shivalika Rudrabatla, Advocates. versus RK METAL ENGINEERING WORKS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 23.09.2026 I.A. 9155/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 592/2026 3. This petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of Work Order dated 13.06.2023 inter alia for fabrication, assembly and erection of steel structure of trellis and Work Order dated 15.10.2024 inter alia for supply, installation, testing and commissioning of 13.52 mm thick clear toughened glass and spider fittings on the trellis. 4. Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the Respondent and submits that the present petition is premature since This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 13:59:55 ARB.P. 592/2026 Petitioner has not resorted to the pre-arbitral mechanism agreed upon between the parties in Clause 19 of the Work Order dated 13.06.2023, which provides that all disputes, differences and claims concerning the contracts shall be first referred to Senior Personnel of both the parties and only when the resolution fails, parties can resort to arbitration. 5. In light of the stand of the Respondent, counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this petition to take recourse to the resolution mechanism provided under Clause 19. He submits that direction be issued to the Respondent to furnish the name and details of the concerned Officer, who is required to be contacted for initiating the resolution mechanism. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner to take recourse to pre-arbitral resolution mechanism envisaged in Clause 19 of Work Order dated 13.06.2023. Counsel for the Respondent shall furnish complete details of the Officer required to be contacted for initiating the said process, within two days from today through e-mail. On a request being made by the Petitioner, Respondent shall ensure that the resolution process is put in motion and the entire exercise shall be completed latest within six weeks from the date of receipt of request. 7. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms, making it clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. JYOTI SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2026/YA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 13:59:55