Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19915 (AP)

Sri Srinivasa And Company v. V.N.Mastanaiah

CC/1209/2025 · 2026-01-01

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010181022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1209/2025 Between: 1. SRI SRINIVASA AND COMPANY,, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER BY NAME, MUPPA GANGAIAH S/O SUBBAIAH LATE, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-2-83, SVN COLONY, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. V N MASTANAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL SOCIETY (R) VIDYA BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, ATMAKURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. B SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR TOWN, ANDHRA PRADESH. PRESENT ADDRESS KBC ZILLA PARISHAD HIGH SCHOOL, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. 3. J NIVAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT STATE OF ANDHRA 2 VS,J C.C.NO.1209 OF 2025 PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 4. S NAGALAKSHMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, GUNTUR. 5. K RAVINDRA BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN SAMAGRA SHIKSHA AMARAVATHI KBC ZILLA PARISHAD HIGH SCHOOL, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. 6. G V RAMANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SAMAGRA SHIKSHA GUNTUR C/O PAMULAPATI SIVAIAH BUILDING, KORETIPADU, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH, PRESENT ADDRESS 4TH FLOOR VIDYA BHAVAN, ATMAKURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. K V NAGA JYOTHI, W/O. NOT KNOWN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SAMAGRA SHIKSHA GUNTUR C/O. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICE, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, GUNTUR. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors No.1 to 7 under section 10 to 12 of the contempt of the courts act, for wilfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble court in W.P. No.3584 of 2024 on dated 13-03-2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAVI KUMAR PONAKAMPALLI 3 VS,J C.C.NO.1209 OF 2025 2. R SUDHA RANI 3. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: 4 VS,J C.C.NO.1209 OF 2025 ORDER: Challenging the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.3584 of 2024 dated 13.03.2024, respondent No.1 has preferred a writ appeal before the Division Bench in W.A.No.856 of 2025, wherein the Division Bench set aside the judgment and order dated 13.03.2024 in W.P.No.3584 of 2024 and the matter is remanded back to the Single Bench having the appropriate roster for fresh consideration. 2. In view of the fact that there is no order to be complied with by the respondents, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 02.01.2026 LSP