APHC010177682013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18893/2013 Between: 1. U.SATTI BABU, S/O KANNA BABU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, NREGS, O/O MPDO, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHPATNAM. 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/ PROGRAMM, OFFICER, NREGS, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the declaring the action of the respondents in not utilizing the services of the petitioner as Field Assistant, NREGS of Gadampalem Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and also not paying salaries attached to the post with effect from 1.9.2012 to till date as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to orders passed in W.P.No.31239 of 2011, dated 22.12.2011 and also violative of Articles 14 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to utilize the services of the petitioner as Field Assistant under NREG Scheme to Gadampalem Village, Golugonda 2 Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and also to pay the salaries attached to the post from 1.9.2012 to till date IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 23099 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the salaries attached to the post of Field Assistant under NREG Scheme with effect from 1.9.2012 to till date pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 104880 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents and that proceedings dated 19.06.2014 were issued whereby the petitioner was extended remuneration from 01.09.2012 onwards. It is submitted that a counter has also been filed by the 1st respondent, duly informing the Court vide proceedings No.176/2014 dated 01.07.2014, as well as further proceedings dated 17.07.2014. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.02.2026 PNS