Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19912 (DEL)

DEVESH BHARDWAJ v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CM(M)/2149/2026 · 2026-09-25

Ajay Digpaul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010463992026 + CM(M) 2149/2026 & CM APPL. 66850/2026 & CM APPL. 66851/2026 DEVESH BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hemant Sharma, Mr. Atin Chadha, Mrs. Munisha Chadha, Mr. Sanjog Singh, Mr. Harjas Singh, Mr. Dhruv Tomar and Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocates versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R % 25.09.2026 1. After some arguments, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (South) Saket Courts, New Delhi to seek modification of the impugned order dated 22.09.2026 passed in MCD APPL. No.7/2026 titled “Devesh Bhardwaj v. MCD”, specifically pertaining to the following paragraph whereby the contentions of the petitioner have been recorded, “It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the appellant that property in question is covered under the Circular dated 12.05.2026 issued by MCD with This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/09/2026 at 10:51:53 respect to the regularization. He submits that all the properties which is prior to 06.04.2026 can be regularized “as is, where is” basis. Thus, the appellant has rightly applied under PM-UDAY Yojna.” 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the impugned order incorrectly records that the petitioner moved an application under the PM-UDAY Yojna. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the petitioner had previously made an application for the regularization of the property in question under the PM-UDAY Yojna, but the same was dismissed. 4. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are granted. 5. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications, if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for. AJAY DIGPAUL, J SEPTEMBER 25, 2026 gs/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/09/2026 at 10:51:53