Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19908 (RAJ)

SAKIR S/O SHRI JAMSHED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15316/2025 · 2026-01-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3374] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15316/2025 Sakir S/o Shri Jamshed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Rayabka, Police Station Sadar, District Alwar (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saddam Hussain U/o of Sakir For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 558/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Alwar, District Alwar Rural for offences punishable u/S 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 351(3), 308(2) & 112(2) of BNS and Section 66D & 42 of the IT Act. 2. Mr. Saddam Hussain, the uncle of the accused petitioner is present in person. He submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and no other criminal case is pending against the accused petitioner. He further submits that the accused petitioner is in custody for about three months. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:3374] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15316/2025] 4. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused petitioner and so also the fact that no other criminal case pending against the accused petitioner and he is in custody since for last about three months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. In case the accused petitioner is found involved in any case of similar nature in future, then prosecution shall be free to make an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /20