Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19907 (AP)

Chittiboina Rajanna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7788/2018 · 2026-02-24

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010178742018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7788/2018 Between: 1. CHITTIBOINA RAJANNA, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.MADAKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R.DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, BADVEL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 5. BURRI RAJESWARI, W/O.VENUGOPAL, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O.MADAKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondent No.3 in mutating the revenue records for the land in an extent of Ac.0.64 Cents in Sy.No.608/2 of Madakalavaripalli village fields, Gopavaram Mandal, 2 Y.S.R.District in favor of the respondent No.5 belong to petitioner without putting the petitioner on notice as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power,contrary to the procedure contemplated under the provisions of the AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and the AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to delete the revenue entries stands on the name of the respondent No.5 for the land in an extent of Ac.0.64 Cents in Sy.No.608/2 of Madakalavaripalli village fields, Gopavaram Mandal, Y.S.R.District and mutate the same in petitioner favour and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to entertain the Sale Deeds, Gift Deeds or any Transfer Document that may be executed by the respondent No.5 for the land in an extent of Ac.0.64 Cents in Sy.No.608/2 of Madakalavaripalli village fields, Gopavaram Mandal, Y.S.R.District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. D KODANDARAMI REDDY 3 The Court made the following ORDER: At the hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has preferred Writ Petition No.14239 of 2023, questioning the proceedings issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, vide D.Dis.60/2022, dated 10.03.2023. In view of the same, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 25.02.2026 KAS 4 164 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7788/2018 Dated: 25.02.2026 KAS