2026:HHC:33895 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13646 of 2026 Decided on: 12.08.2026 Mrs. Saraswati Negi … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has made available for the perusal of the Court the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner. Perusal thereof demonstrates that similar reliefs were prayed therein as have been prayed in the present writ petition. 2. In light of this fact, as the earlier order passed by this Court in CWP No.3055 of 2026 has now been complied with by the respondents, the proper course open for the petitioner is to seek execution of the said order rather than filing a fresh petition on the same cause. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to seek execution of the earlier order. 3. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 12, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?