[2026:RJ-JP:2898] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15317/2025 Hariom S/o Shri Radhakishan @ Bhajju Meena, Age About 35 Years, Resident of Peepli Ka Bass, Police Station Bagad Tiraya, District Alwar. (At present confined in District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Umashankar Pandey HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.298/2025 registered at Police Station Bagad Tiraya, District Alwar for offence punishable under Section 109(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. During the course of investigation, offence punishable under Section 117(2) of BNS, 2023 has also been added against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged incident took place in spur of the moment. Counsel submits that it is a case of sole injury. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 10.11.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:2898] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15317/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail application. They submit that that sole injury is grievous in nature and it has been opined by the medical expert that said injury may be dangerous to life. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that it is a case of sole injury, so also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Hariom S/o Shri Radhakishan @ Bhajju Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /51