JITENDER v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI WTRAN NIGAM AND ORS
CWP/16103/2026 · 2026-05-21
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19902 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19902 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-16103-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
135
CWP-16103-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026
Jitender ....Petitioner VERSUS Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present : Mr. Shivendu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C).
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. AG Haryana-respondent No.4.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the letter dated 02.01.2025 (Annexure P-8) and seeking issuance of a prerogative writ or mandamus and directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Assistant Lineman along with all consequential benefits.
2.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present writ petition and seeks permission PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.05.21 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CWP-16103-2026
to withdraw the same, with liberty to avail the alternative remedy as may be available to the petitioner, in accordance with law.
3.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with aforesaid liberty.
4.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 21.05.2026 Puneet Chawla
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No
Whether Reportable. :
Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.05.21 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document