Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010204882026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10492/2026 Between:
1. KETHAVATH RUKMINI BAI, W/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, DOOR NO. 19-991,
RASOOLPET, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, PIDUGURALLA PALNADU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT- 522408.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DACHEPALLI POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT- 522414.
4. KETHAVATH BALAJI NAIK, S/O. VENKATESWARLU NAIK, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. DOOR NO. 4-316, NADIKUDI VILLAGE, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT-522414
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N ANULA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
Dr.YLR, J
W.P.No.10492 of 2026
Dated 08.05.2026
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief :-
“…to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 and 3 in interfering into the civil disputes inspite of the civil Appeal in A.S No. 29/2025 pending before the X Additional District Judge, Gurazala is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also offends the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere into the civil disputes pertaining to the Hanuman lime stone Mill situated in Sr. No. 156/15-B2 at Industrial park Nadikudi village, Dachepalli Mandal, Palnadu District and pass such order(s).”
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. N. Anula, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are illegally interfering in a civil dispute despite the pendency of A.S. No. 29/2025. Such interference is alleged to be arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner therefore seeks a direction restraining the Respondents from interfering in the civil disputes relating to the Hanuman Limestone Mill.
4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the police have never interfered in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No.4.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and recording the
submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is
3
Dr.YLR, J
W.P.No.10492 of 2026
Dated 08.05.2026
disposed of, directing the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere henceforth in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.4 without following due process of law.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 08.05.2026 KMS
4
Dr.YLR, J
W.P.No.10492 of 2026
Dated 08.05.2026
256 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 10492 of 2026
Date: 08.05.2026 KMS