[2026:RJ-JP:615] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15387/2025 Bacchu Singh Alias Sher Singh S/o Gopiram @ Shyam Singh @ Sahab Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Maina Pind, Police Station Lambi District Muktsar (Punjab) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 409/2019, registered with the Police Station, Khandela, District Sikar for offence punishable u/S 392 of I.P.C. 1860. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. She also submits that as per First Information Report the faces of the accused persons were covered with the cloth. No recovery of any article has been made at the instance of the accused-petitioner. It is also submitted that police after completion of the investigation has submitted chargesheet and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner also submits that [2026:RJ-JP:615] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15387/2025] co-accused namely Rahul has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 08.12.2021 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 12303/2021. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that the accused-petitioner was absconding and he has been arrested after a long time. 5. Considered the submission made at Bar and perused the challan papers. 6. As per the contents of the First Information Report allegations have been made against the 3-4 persons whose faces were covered at the time of incident. 7. The case of the accused-petitioner is in no manner distinguishable from the case of the co-accused namely Rahul who has already been enlarged on bail. 8. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and so also so as to maintain the parity, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any [2026:RJ-JP:615] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15387/2025] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /133