SNEHA SOUHARDA SPORTS AND RECREATION CLUB v. SRI.MALLIKARJUNA BALDANDI
CCC/59/2026 · 2026-06-09
K S Hemalekha
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19898 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19898 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27475-DB CCC No. 59 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.59 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SNEHA SOUHARDA SPORTS AND RECREATION CLUB, SALIGRAMA TOWN, SALIGRAMA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571604 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY H.S. GIRISH, S/O NAGARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI MAHENDRA B.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. MALLIKARJUNA BALDANDI SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU-570 001. 2. RAJANNA DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MYSORE SOUTH, MYSURU - 570001. 3. SHASHI KUMAR CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SALIGRAMA TOWN, SALIGRAMA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 604. 4. SHASHIKUMAR SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE ( INCHARGE INSPECTOR OF POLICE) (VACANT POST) SALIGRAMA POLICE STATION MYSORE DISTRICT - 571604. …ACCUSED
Digitally signed by C K LATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27475-DB CCC No. 59 of 2026
5. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. SUKANYA BALIGA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR PRO FORMA RESPONDENT NO.5)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4 FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 03.07.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.18025/2025 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 03.07.2025 passed in Writ Petition No 18025/2025 (GM-Police). 2. The complainant alleges that the respondents are interfering with its business which is lawfully being conducted. The learned counsel appearing for the complainant has referred to paragraph 4 of the order dated 03.07.2025 passed in Writ Petition No. 18025/2025 (GM-Police) and contends that the directions
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27475-DB CCC No. 59 of 2026
articulated in the said paragraphs are being violated. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order are set out below :
"4.
It is settled position in law that once the activities of Members of petitioner Association are being carried on lawfully, the question of respondent Police interfering would not arise unless the activities contravene any provision of law. Needless to state that, it is always open to the respondent Authorities to exercise the powers vested in them, if they have information regarding commission of offence or violation of law. Such action of the respondent Police cannot be considered to be interference. 5. Needless to state, it is open to the respondents to make enquiry if the respondents are of the view that the activities of the petitioner are not limited to games of skill but includes game of chance."
3. It is clear from the aforesaid paragraphs that no specific directions have been issued. We are unable to accept that any action taken by the police authorities would be construed as willful disobedience of the aforesaid directions, warranting and initiating of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The complaint is accordingly closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE CKL List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1