[2026:RJ-JP:2371-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1152/2024 In D.B. Civil (PIL) Writ Petition No.14844/2024 Mohan Lal S/o Shri Mangi Lal, R/o 89, Yuvraj Vihar Colony Hathoj, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302012 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Rukmani Riar, Ias, The Commissioner Jaipur Development Authority, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 302005. 2. Smt. Anandi Ias, The Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 302015 3. Ms. Arshdeep Brar, Ras, Presently Posted As Dy. Director, Women And Child Development Department, Jaipur-302105 4. Shri Priyawarit Singh Charan Ras, The Deputy Commissioner Malviya Nagar, Nagar Nigam Greater, Near Vidhan Sabha, Jaipur. 302015 5. State Of Rajasthan Through The Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. R.K. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG assisted by Mr. Manoj Kumar Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 20/01/2026 1. The issue is in respect of non-removal of encroachment, allegedly made in the gullies of Adarsh Bazar, including Gully Nos.17 & 18 of the Barkat Nagar, Jaipur. 2. It appears that vide order dated 19.09.2024 passed in DB Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.14844/2024, following directions were issued by this Court:- “5. We are of the view that the petitioner is required to submit a detailed representation giving all details as contained in this petition within a period of 15 days from today to the Deputy Commissioner, Malviya Nagar, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. Once such representation is made, the Deputy Commissioner, Malviya Nagar, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur shall cause spot inspection to be [2026:RJ-JP:2371-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1152/2024] carried within a period of one month from the date of representation. Thereafter, upon receipt of spot inspection report, if any encroachment on public road or other public properties/public land is found, the same shall be directed to be removed forthwith.” 3. In furtherance of the order dated 19.09.2024, the petitioner submitted a representation. As per the reply filed by and on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 4, the encroachments raised by private persons on the public footpaths have been removed. A compliance report, duly supported by photographs, evidencing the removal of the encroachments, has been placed on record. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the representation, the issue of encroachment on the road situated in front of the Cremation Ground, Madhuban Colony, was also raised, however, the same has not been removed. 5. It appears that one of the photographs submitted by the respondents, depicts the removal of encroachment on the road situated in front of the Cremation Ground. No counter has been filed by or on behalf of the petitioner in this regard. 6. We find that substantial compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 19.09.2024, has been made and respondents have not committed any deliberate or willful disobedience of such directions. 7. In view of the above, proceedings of present contempt petition, are dropped and the contempt petition is hereby dismissed. Notices of contempt stand discharged accordingly. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/4