Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19892 (AP)

KAMPA MADHAVI v. ORUGANTI SUGUNAVATHI @ SUGUNA

CRP/860/2024 · 2026-02-01

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010175822024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 860/2024 Between: 1. KAMPA MADHAVI, W/O SURI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 8-61/B, RAVI NAGAR, NAIDU THOTA, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SEERAPU JYOTHI, W/O SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 46-13-64, DONDAPARTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. ORUGANTI SUGUNAVATHI SUGUNA, W/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O RUDRAVARAM, SN PADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. REDDY LABS, F.T.O. 07, DUVVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. EASAI PHARMACEUTICALS, PLOT NOS. 96, 97, 98, 124, 126, LANKAPALEM ROAD, DUWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE NAVAL ARMAMENT DEPOT CIVIL EMPLOYEES, COOPERATIVESOCIETY LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530009. (RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THE ABOVE CIVIL REVISION PETITION) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to file against the Orders dated 21- 02-2024 in I.A No.1518 of 2023 in G.W.O.P No.31 of 2021 on the file of Principal District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole, IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in G.W.O.P No.31 of 2021 on the file of Principal District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole Pending disposal of above Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the petitioners, reported that suit itself has been disposed of and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. Registry has also placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 25.09.2025 the suit was disposed of. 3. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02.02.2026 ANS 245 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 860/2024 Date: 02.02.2026 ANS