APHC010174942003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.5 of 2003 In/and APPEAL SUIT NO: 3489 of 2003 Between: 1. J. KEDARESWARAIAH, S/O RUDRAIAH C/O M. SIVANAGAIAH, H.NO.44-8-1A, PRAKASH NAGAR, ...APPELLANT AND 1. J SUGUNAMMA, W/o J.Kedareswaraiah R/o Nannoor (V), Oravacal (M), Kurnool Dt. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C PATTABHI RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 11.12.2025, the following order was passed: < Learned counsel for the appellant is not present. As the matter is of the year 2003 and being listed after long time, to give one more opportunity, list next week.= 2 2. The decree under challenge arises from the suit filed by the wife for maintenance, which was partly allowed. 3. There is delay of 95 days in filing the appeal. 4. Today, no representation for the appellant. 5. The I.A. is rejected for want of prosecution. Consequently, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as barred by limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 07.01.2026 Pab 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM I.A.No.5 of 2003 In/and APPEAL SUIT NO: 3489 of 2002 DATE: 07.01.2026 Pab