(1) 2- c. p. 307-2005.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 307 OF 2005 IN WP/5747/2004 SATISH DATTU KATLE ….Petitioner VERSUS RAJPAL V PATIL AND ANOTHER …..Respondents ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. R R Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde ....... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2026 ORDER (PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.):- 1. This Contempt Petition is filed for compliance of ad-interim order passed in the Writ Petition. But subsequently the Writ Petition itself is disposed of on 20.06.2017. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the Contempt Petition and the same is disposed of with liberty that if at all the directions in the Writ Petition are not complied with, the petitioner can seek appropriate remedy as available in law. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/