APHC010174112018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 7665/2018 Between: 1. TIRU VENKATACHALAPATHY NAIDU,, S/O VENKATASWAMY NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, IDALAPALLEM VILLAGE, N.R.PETA POST, G.D.NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (REVENUE). SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMMAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENTING ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V RAGHU RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) NJS,J W.P No.7665 of 2018 2 The Court made the following Order: The present writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the different extents of lands situate in various survey numbers i.e., Ac.0.77 cents in S.No.195/3, Ac.0.88 cents in S.No.195/1, Ac.0.43 cents in S.No.194/1, Ac.0.34 cents in S.No.193/2, Ac.0.22 cents in S.No.196 and Ac.0.45 cents in S.No.172/3 of Idalapalem Village, G.D Nellore Mandal, Chittoor Taluka, Chittoor District, which fell to the share of the petitioner pursuance to the judgment and decree in O.S No.15 of 1983 dated 31.08.1997 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Chittoor, as illegal, arbitrary, etc. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K Arjun Chowdary and Ms. Siva Jyothi Kudupudi, learned Assistant Government Pleaders representing the concerned respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner while explaining the circumstances under which the present writ petition was filed, on instructions, submits that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, there is no interference with the subject matter property. 4. In the written instructions dated 30.12.2025 furnished by the Tahsildar, G.D Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District to the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, it is inter alia mentioned that the land in Survey No.195/3 stands in the name of the petitioner’s father in revenue records of Ambodara Palli Village and that there is a Cart track (Road) is existing and passing through the said survey number. It is also mentioned that the previously, the Panchayat Raj Department tried to lay pucca road in the existing cart track and due to objection of the petitioner, the work was stopped. It is further stated that the existing road passing through the patta lands of the petitioner’s family and other farmers are very much necessary. NJS,J W.P No.7665 of 2018 3 5. However, as seen from the instructions dated 02.12.2025 furnished by the Executive Engineer (FAC), PRI Division, Chittoor to the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, it appears that the Panchayat Raj Department had not undertaken any works in respect of the subject matter properties. Be that as it may. 6. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, there is no interference by the respondent authorities, this Court deems it not necessary to examine the matter further and dispose of the writ petition, providing that the petitioner may seek recourse to law, in the event any fresh cause of action arises. 7. With the above observations/directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:06.01.2026 Ksj