Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19877 (AP)

KAYAKOOL ABDULLAH, E.G.DIST v. SECY, REV DEPT, HYD & 4 OTHERS

WP/11555/2013 · 2026-03-29

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010171302013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11555/2013 Between: 1. KAYAKOOL ABDULLAH, E.G.DIST, S/O MOHIDEEN FLAT NO.B-8, DEVI NIVAS NEAR BHANUGUDI JUNCTION, KAKINADA-533003. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SECY REV DEPT HYD 4 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNCIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGER, A.P.STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KAKINADA. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. E RAMAKRISHNA, S/O RAVINDRANATH AGED ABOUT 45 YRS. HINDU, BUSINESS R/O D.NO.48-9-12, SHIVRAM FOOD COURT, DWARAKANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. M KRISHNA RAO (S C FOR MUN CORP OF KAKINADA) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri Pappu Srinivasa Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that no further consideration is necessary and therefore, the Writ Petition may be closed. 2. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:30.03.2026 Vns