APHC010175732019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7579/2019 Between: 1. SHAIK KHALEEL, S/O HASAN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KANIGIRI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR REVENUE DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KANIGIRI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner house site with an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents comprised in Sy.no 488 of Kanigiri Village and Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner house site 2 JS,J W.P.No.7579/2019 with an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents comprised in Sy.no 488 of Kanigiri Village and Mandal, Prakasam District IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner house site with an Ac. 0.03 cents comprised in Sy.no 488 of Kanigiri Village and Mandal, Prakasam District without following due process of law in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.7579/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents Revenue authorities submits that neither the Tahsildar nor any other revenue officials inspected the land in Sy.No.488 of Kanigiri Revenue Village, nor did they cause any obstruction to the construction activities in the said area. 3. It is further submitted that the petitioner, in a statement dated 18.06.2019, clarified that due to a mistake of fact and identity, they had mistakenly presumed that the individuals who approached their property were officials from the Revenue Department. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner request to record the statement and close the writ petition. 4. Considering the written instructions, the Court deems it appropriate to close the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed, directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s property without following the due procedure as contemplated under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 18.03.2026 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.7579/2019 249 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7579/2019 Dated: 18.03.2026 RSD