APHC010174872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 972/2025 Between: 1. P.V.S.R. CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS THE MANAGING PARTNER, KATASANI HAH PRASAD REDDY, S/O. SURENDRANATHA REDDY , AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 1- 10, KONDAPURAM VILLAGE, DORNIPADU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. SRI BUDITHI RAJASEKHAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL AND CO OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 4. SRI S DILLI RAO, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. C V SUBBA REDDY, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. V RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING 2 ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ CIRCLE, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. K NAGARAJU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ PRI DIVISION AND PIU NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. SRI M VIJAYA SUNITHA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE MARKETING, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. R 8 IS IMPLEDED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.14.08.2025. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2025 IN CC NO.972 OF 2025. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 03.07.2024 passed in W.P No. 12761 of 2024 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed respondent as Respondent No. 8 in C.C.No. 972 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the respondents submits that, the order under contempt has already been complied with as per the instructions of the 7th respondent dated 02.01.2026 which shall be made as part of the court record. The learned counsel for the petitioner also does not dispute the same. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt case and accordingly, it is closed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 02.01.2026 NNN