Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19868 (PNJ)

RUKSINA AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CRWP/5642/2026 · 2026-05-14

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5642 IN THE (113) RUKSINA A STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. the Constituti directing the o of the petition on their repres 2. they are maj relationship an parents and re living with 5642-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da NA AND ANR Versus HARYANA AND ORS. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file stitution of India seeking issuance the official respondents No.1 to 3 etitioners at the hands of respondents representation dated 11.05.2026 (Anne It is submitted by the learned cou e major. They are in love. Their hip and threats have even been extend and relatives to kill her. She has left the petitioner No.2. Apprehendin JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5642-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  vocate for the petitioner aryana en filed under Article 226/227 of suance of a writ of mandamus to protect the life and liberty ndents No.4 to 16 and take action (Annexure P-3). ed counsel for the petitioners that Their parents are against their extended to petitioner No.1 by her as left her house and has started hending danger to their lives and AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5642 liberty, they se but the same h petition. 3. 4. of respondents to supply the c 5. learned State their relationsh the veracity of the sanctity o disposed of w Police, Distric representation and also to tak the petitioners 6. the petitioners them. 14.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5642-2026 (O&M) (2) they sent representation dated 11.05.2 same has not been taken into consider Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ndents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The pet y the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel fo State counsel and without going into ationship as well as without entering u city of the averments made in the peti ctity of relationship or age of the of with a direction to the responde District Nuh (Mewat) to look into the on dated 11.05.2026 (Annexure P to take necessary step, if any, genuine ioners is found. It is made clear that this order s ioners from legal action for violation o Whether speaking/reasoned:    1.05.2026 to the respondent No.2 nsideration and hence, the present Haryana, accepts notice on behalf he petitioners’ counsel is directed sel for the petitioners as well as g into the question of legality of ering upon an exercise to evaluate he petition and also with regard to f the petitioners, this petition is spondent No.2-Superintendent of nto the matter and dispose of the ure P-3) in accordance with law enuine threat to life and liberty of rder shall not be taken to protect ation of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.