Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2026 DAILYLAW 19862 (BOM)
MAHA. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THR. ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, AMRAVATI v. JAGDISH ANANDRAO KADU AND OTHER
CAF/3995/2025 · 2026-10-15
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19862 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19862 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
38 caf 3995-2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3995 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16695 OF 2025 Maha. State Road Transport Corporation, Thr. Its Divisional Controller, Amravati VERSUS Jagdish Anandrao Kadu And Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri V.H. Kedar, Advocate for appellant Shri S.S. Alaspurkar, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 15.10.2026
1. By this application, the applicant is seeking the condonation of 199 days caused in filing the appeal.
Learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondent did not file any reply to this application, as such, the averments made in the application are remain uncontroverted.
2. Hence, for the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 199 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
3. The Office is directed to register the appeal.
4. The application stands disposed of.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare
Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/10/2026 10:31:35