Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19861 (RAJ)

MOINUDDEEN @ MOIN S/O ASLAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15101/2025 · 2026-01-20

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2411] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15101/2025 Moinuddeen @ Moin S/o Aslam, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Khanpur Mewan, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal- Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 863/2026 Aslam S/o Ramjan, R/o Village Khanpur Mewan, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyendra Singh Tanwar Mr. Garvit Saraswat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/01/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.404/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal Tijara for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 74, 189(2) and 329(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:2411] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15101/2025] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that no specific injuries have been attributed to the present petitioners. The injury described as dangerous to life has been specifically attributed to the co-accused, Fakru. They again submit that petitioners are behind the bar since 05.11.2025 and 09.12.2025 respectively. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Moinuddeen @ Moin S/o Aslam and Aslam S/o Ramjan, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/80-81