MD. MOUJUD ALIAS MD. SAUKHAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6422/2026 · 2026-07-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19858 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19858 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20560] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6422 of 2026
------ Md. Moujud @ Md. Sukhal aged about 57 years, S/O Md. Nejam Seikh, Resident of Village: Khatkhur Bahal, Post-Office & Police Station: Kutra, District: Sundergarh (Odisha).
.... .... …. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party.
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate.
For the State
: Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 10-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nagri P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 12(1) of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Slaughter Prohibition Act, 2005 and under Sections 11(1)(D), 11(1)(E) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit.
Keep the same in the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal transportation of bovine animals which were being taken for their illegal slaughter. It is then submitted that the author allegation is that on seeing the police, the petitioner fled away leaving the vehicle loaded with bovine animals. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.04.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Nagri P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/07/2026 Amar/