1 2026:CGHC:22810 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2469 of 2026 1 - Aatmaram S/o Rainuram Gond Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Kodobhath, P.S. And Tehsil Mainpur, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Gariyaband, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Upper Collector Gariyaband, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Mainpur, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Tahsildar Mainpur, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/05/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent authorities to expeditious decide RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Revenue Case No. 2022072218000004/2206/Apl within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Court to the respondents, to decide the appeal filed under Section 44 (1) of C.G. Land Revenue Code dated 28.11.2023 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending appeal, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. His pending appeal will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the concerned respondent No. 2 to consider/decide the appeal of the petitioner dated 28.11.2023 in accordance with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the 3 merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat