Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19857 (AP)

G. Venkateshwara Rao v. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

WP/38983/2013 · 2026-01-30

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.38983_2013 APHC010169642013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38983/2013 Between: 1. G. VENKATESHWARA RAO,, S/O. NAGABHUSHANA RAO, AGE 47 YEARS, WORKING AS OD, A.P.S.R.T.C.,GUDIVADA DEPOT, R/O. PARNASE, KALVAPUDI AGRAHARAM, GUDIVADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BUS BAVAN,MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION , GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not allotting alternative post of Desk Job to the petitioner as per the provisions of as per the section 47 of Persons with disabilities (Equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) Act, 1995 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 48437 OF 2013 2 HN, J W.P.No.38983_2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dt. 26.12.2013 pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 30430 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay arrears of salaries for the month of December 2013 and January 2014 and from the month of April 2014 onwards and continue to pay the same further Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M L ALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SATYANARAYAN MURTHY(SC FOR APSRTC) 3 HN, J W.P.No.38983_2013 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38983 of 2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner is presently working in an alternative post and that appropriate proceedings in this regard have already been issued by the competent authority. 2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition stands closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to seek any relief, in accordance with law, if the petitioner is in any manner aggrieved by the said proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:31.01.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.38983_2013 84 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38983 of 2013 Date: 31.01.2026 NKA