- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26309 WP NO.14602 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14602 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAJU K.K. S/O LATE. KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O KUTTAWADI VILLAGE, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JNANESH KUMAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR H.D.KOTE TALUK, H.D.KOTE, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 114. 3. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, KASABA HOBLI, H.D.KOTE TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26309 WP NO.14602 OF 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16TH DECEMBER, 2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.RRT DISP/334/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-D; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO MUTATE THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 16th December, 2025 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.2 in Case No.RRT.Disp/334/2025; inter alia sought for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the schedule properties. 3. Heard Sri. Jnanesh Kumar K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26309 WP NO.14602 OF 2026 4. Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents submitted that the petitioner is having an efficacious remedy under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 to challenge the impugned order. 5. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34