APHC010169002013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6393/2013 Between: 1. U.V.SESHAMRAJU, & 367 OTHERS, - ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONEWR, BARKATPURA,HYDERABAD 2. THE ASST PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER PENSIONS, SUB- REGIONAL OFFICE,TIRUPATHI,CHITTOOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent whereunder the weightage of 2 years for fixing up of pension is rejected to the petitioners as being arbitrary, and illegal, and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith re-fix the pension giving weightage of 2 years of service by calculating the pensionable service as a total service rendered without taking 16.11.1995 as cut off date and also pay the arrears eligible with 18% interest p.a.in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 7997 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith re-fix their pension by adding weightage of 2 2 years in view of the services rendered by them which is more than 20 years pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 39617 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T BALAJI(SC FOR EPFO) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioners. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 24.02.2026 PNS