Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1985 (JHR)

NIRMAL MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./674/2026 · 2026-02-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3332 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.674 of 2026 Nirmal Mahato, aged about 48 years, S/o late Banshidhar Mahato, R/o village Pupunki, Tola Karmagora, P.O. Pupunki Ashram, P.S. Chas (M), District Bokaro, Jharkhand …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, PP ------ 2/09.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sector IV P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019, registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120-B of IPC, pending in the court of Learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the Branch Manager of Kolkata Weir Group Industries Limited and the allegations are made that the said company has taken money of the innocent persons saying that the amount deposited in the said company will give benefit in different schemes. He also submits that the liability can be fastened only against the director. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there that the innocent persons have been cheated by the company. 5. Considering that this petitioner being the Branch Manager has collected the said amount and the allegations are there of siphoning 2026:JHHC:3332 2 huge amount of many persons, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. 7. This petition is accordingly disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 09.02.2026 R.Kumar