( 2026:HHC:34851 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1005 of 2026 Date of decision: 19.08.2026 Aditya Sharma ….Petitioner Versus Anju Sharma ….Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 14.08.2026 alongwith Office Order dated 07.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the claim of the petitioner is totally wrong and is hereby denied and rejected. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid order dated 07.08.2026, in accordance with law, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge August 19, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2