1 2026:CGHC:22192-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 268 of 2026 1 - Amar Narayan Singh S/o Parshuram Singh Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. 368, Near Ayappa Mandir, Baliram Kashyap Ward No. 43, Nayamunda, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintendent Of Police Narayanpur, Distt. Naraynapur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar Naraynapur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Municipal Officer Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Lakhuram Korram S/o Jagnath Korram R/o Kumharpara, Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Soni Bai Korram W/o Lakhuram Korram R/o Kumharpara, Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Smt. Pramila Pradhan Parshad Ward No. 13, R/o Kumharpara, Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.05.15 10:17:05 +0530 2 9 - Smt. Ramtula Bhandari Anganbadi Karyakart, Kendra Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Lachchhuram Korram S/o Gajjuram Korram R/o Kumharpara, Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sourabh Kumar Pande, Dy. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 12/05/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “10.1) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the possession of the respondents for its kind perusal. 10.2) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 Station House Officer, Police Station Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) to register an F.I.R. as per law against the private respondents and the persons involved and investigate the matter. 10.3) Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite several 3 complaints have been made no action has been taken by the State respondents. 3. We have perused the prayers and pleadings made in the writ petition. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the Court below by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. (now, under Section 175(3) or under Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023). He further submits that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd Sd/- /- Sd (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok