Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19838 (HP)

SURESH KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./1266/2026 · 2026-08-06

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1266 of 2026 Decided on: 06.08.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Suresh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 05.08.2026 and office order dated 06.09.2025, passed by the Director, Town & Country Planning, Deptt. Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-9, office order dated 30.05.2026 and letter dated 01.06.2026, passed by the Town and Country Planner, Divisional Town Planning Office, Solan, District Solan (HP), along with office order dated 02.07.2026 passed by Chief Electoral Officer, Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. A perusal of office order dated 30.05.2026, reveals that the petitioner has been granted the work charge status on completion of eight years of daily wage service in the cadre and his basic pay has been refixed w.e.f. 01.01.2008. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 02.07.2025 passed in CWP No.873 of 2021, titled, Suresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, has been duly complied with and the case of the petitioner has been considered in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, titled, State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Surajmani and others, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the office orders mentioned above, he shall be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. 4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 06 th August , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge