Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19826 (RAJ)

BABULAL GURJAR SON OF SHRI GANGABISHAN v. JAGDISH SON OF GANGABISHAN GURJAR

CW/17952/2025 · 2026-01-29

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4155] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17952/2025 Babulal Gurjar Son of Shri Gangabishan, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jagdish Son of Gangabishan Gurjar, Resident of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk. 2. 2/1. 2/2. 2/3. 2/4. 2/5. 2/6. Bhavani Shankar, Son of Kalyan, Resident Of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk (Deceased) Kishan, Son Of Late Bhavani Shankar Ramavtar, Son Of Late Bhavani Shankar Laxman, Son Of Late Bhavani Shankar Sita Daughter Of Late Bhavani Shankar Wife Of Sonu Gurjar, Resident Of Mahwa, Tehsil And District Tonk Geeta Daughter Of Late Bhavani Shankar Wife Of Ummed Gurjar, Resident Of Ramnagar, Tehsil Uniara District Tonk. Laxma Daughter Of Late Bhavani Shankar Wife Of Khushiram Gurjar, Resident Of Banetha, Tehsil Uniara District Tonk. 3. Prem Devi Wife Of Shankar Lal, Resident Of Village Jhalara, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk. 4. Smt. Rani Ahuja Wife Of Harish Ahuja, Resident Of T.R- 25, Civil Line, Tonk. 5. Smt. Radha Wife Of Brahmanand, Resident Of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniara (Deceased) 6. Ramdayal Son Of Brahmanand, Resident Of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniyara. 7. Urmila Daughter Of Brahmanand, Resident Of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniara. 8. Smt. Ramkanya Wife Of Badrilal, Resident Of Village Kakod, Tehsil Uniara. 9. Tehsildar, Uniara, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kumar Jain Ms. Priyanka Jain For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 29/01/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:4155] (2 of 2) [CW-17952/2025] 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at some length, upon instructions from his client, submits that as the second appeal itself has been decided on 01.12.2025, wherein an application filed under Order 1 and 2 Rule 10 CPC was decided by the learned Board of Revenue, therefore, prayer made in the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Heard. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. All other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /120-S