1 / 3 2026:CGHC:21264 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3905 of 2026 Madhaw Das Chandra S/o Late Heera Das Chandra Aged About 63 Years Retired Lecturer, R/o Village Faraswani, Tahsil Dabhara, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Accountant General (Account And Pension) Vidhan Sabha Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Account Officer Sub Treasury, Dabhara, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sakrali, Block Dabhara, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.05.11 18:58:51 +0530 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Mr. Parth Kumar Jha, Advocate For State : Mr. Love Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Resp. No.2 : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 06/05/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly please to allow the petition and direct the respondent to pay the difference amount with interest to the petitioner, interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and decide the representation of the petitioner within stipulated time.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner after his superannuation was entitled to receive entire amount of provident fund as deposited in his GPF account, however, petitioner has been paid less amount of GPF than that, of the amount for which he is entitled for. Petitioner had submitted representation to the Office of Accountant General, however, no decision has been taken on his representation. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/Accountant General submits that petitioner has been authorized payment of entire amount which was due to be paid according to GPF account of petitioner available in the office of Accountant General. He, however, submits that amount of GPF which is stated to be payable to petitioner by the office of Accountant General is provisional and it is to be re-calculated at the time of final calculation considering entire record. 3 / 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents available on record. 5. According to submission made by learned counsel for petitioner and pleadings made it appears that petitioner has raised dispute that he has not been paid entire amount which is due to petitioner as per GPF account maintained by respondent- State as also office of Accountant General. 6. In the aforementioned facts of case, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing respondent No.2 and 5 to forward all the copy of records relating to GPF account of petitioner, to the office of respondent No.2/Accountant General within a period of 45 days and thereafter respondent No.2 shall fix the date for appearance of the petitioner as also respondent No.5 in their office for verifying the records by issuing notice to them within further period of 1 month thereafter. The respondent No.2 shall thereafter pass an order afresh on the claim of petitioner within further period of one month. 7. It is ordered accordingly. 8. Writ petition stands disposed of with above observations and directions. Sd/Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen