Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19822 (PNJ)

YASH PAL AND ORS v. DR. AMAR PAL SINGH AND ANR

COCP/1210/2026 · 2026-05-19

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[224] Yash Pal an Dr. Amar P Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] Shri Kesha Phase-VIII, The same counsel for [2] IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-121 Date of De Pal and others versus mar Pal Singh and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Shreesh Kakkar, Advocate Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Compliance report by way of Keshav Goyal, PCS, Secretary, Pun VIII, Mohali, District SAS Nagar, same is taken on record. Copy the sel for the petitioners. As per the same, the stand of th “3. That in complianc Hon’ble Court, t regularization w answering depon aspect that the petitioners, 3 h could be passed remaining writ pe back door entrant T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 1210-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 19.05.2026 …Petitioners ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN vocate for the petitioners. ocate for the respondents. ay of affidavit dated 01.05.2026 of y, Punjab School Education Board, agar, has been filed in Court today. py thereof has been supplied to the d of the respondents reads as under:- liance of the aforesaid order of this rt, the claim of the petitioner for n was duly reconsidered by the eponent specifically taking the the petitioners out of the 5 writ 3 had retired, thereby, no order ssed and as regards the other 2 t petitioners, they all engaged as trants without assessment of merit. 26 of oard, oday. o the - this for the the writ rder r 2 as RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:22 I agree to specified portions of this document COCP-1210-2026 (O&M) -2- 4. That under these facts and circumstances and on the basis of the available official record, the applicable policy/instructions, and the relevant legal position, a detailed speaking order dated 30.04.2026 has been passed by the answering deponent, wherein the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. The copy of order dated: 30.04.2026 is annexed herewith as Annexure R-1.” [3] In view thereof, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same is ordered to be disposed off. [4] However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to avail their remedies, in accordance with law, if so advised. [5] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 19.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:22 I agree to specified portions of this document