APHC010164662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY SECOND APPEAL No.255 of 2025 Between: 1. GUDIBANDI RAMI REDDY (DIED) 2. GUDIBANDI KOTI REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: HEAVY VEHICLE DRIVER, R/O. KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA. 3. GUDIBANDI SRINIVASA REDDY (ALIAS) SIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: POULTRY BUSINESS, SRI KANAKA DURGA EGG & CHICKEN CENTER, TAGORE TYPE INSTITUTE ROAD, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. 4. . GUDIBANDI SITA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O. LATE RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KOGANTI RAMAIAH PUBLIC SCHOOL ROAD, NUNNA VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. KOLLI RADHAKRISHNA REDDY (DIED) 2. KOLLI DASARADHA RAMIREDDY, S/O. RADHA KRISHNA REDDY, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. KUNDAVARI KANDRIKA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. KOLLI MOHAN REDDY, S/O. RADHA KRISHNA REDDY, 2 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 225- TOWNE RIDGE LN, CHAPEL HILL, N.C.27516-4356, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 4. KOLLI CHITTEMMA, W/O. RADHA KRISHNA REDDY, AGE NOT KNOWN, HOUSE WIFE, R/O.KUNDAVARI KANDRIKA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. BOMMAREDDY JAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. RAJASEKHARA READDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KUNDAVARI KANDRIKA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. P PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY SECOND APPEAL No.255 of 2025 J U D G M E N T: Pursuant to the letter dated 31.12.2025 filed by the learned counsel for the appellants in the Registry to list the matter for withdrawal, the matter is listed today under the caption 8For Withdrawal9. 2. Both the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the matter is settled out of Court between both the parties. A memo is also filed to that effect by the learned counsel for the appellants. Therefore, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the second appeal. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 08.01.2026 IBL 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY SECOND APPEAL No.255 of 2025 Dt: 08.01.2026 IBL