W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 R.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk, Satchiyapuram, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 16.10.2025 and online application submitted on 31.01.2026 and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to issue Legal Heirship Certificate to the petitioner for the deceased husband Ramar on 17.04.2025. For Petitioner :Mr.R.R.Kannan For Respondents :Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader ***** 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 O R D E R The petitioner is before this Court seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.10.2025 and the online application submitted on 31.01.2026. By the said representation/application, the petitioner has sought issuance of a legal heir certificate of her alleged deceased husband, including her name, the parents of the deceased, and the petitioner’s son. 2. Mr. D. Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the deceased was earlier married to one Mani and there is no material to show that the said marriage was dissolved. It is further submitted that the petitioner claims to have married the deceased only in the year 2015, whereas her son, namely Pravin, was born in the year 2001. Hence, according to the learned Additional Government Pleader, the petitioner is not entitled to seek issuance of a legal heir certificate. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 3. The issues raised involve disputed questions of fact, which require verification by the competent authority. Such disputed facts cannot be adjudicated in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Therefore, this Court is inclined to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation and application on their own merits. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.10.2025 and the online application dated 31.01.2026, conduct a proper enquiry after issuing notice to all necessary parties, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 5. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Index :Yes / No 25.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No cmr 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk, Satchiyapuram, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cmr W.P.(MD)No.7976 of 2026 25.03.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis