APHC010167132019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 7220/2019 Between: 1. B. NAGARAJU,, S/O. LATE VENKATESHWARULU, AGE- 40 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, R/O. D. NO. 18-29 (NEW), D. NO. 6/1044 (OLD), ASSESSMENT NO. 3429, MAIN ROAD, OPPOSITE SAKILTOMB, KANEKAL MANDAL, RAYADURGAM TALUQ, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELUGUPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KANEKAL POLICE STATION, KANKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. B CHIKKANNA, S/O. LATE VENKATESHWARULU, AGE- 43 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, R/O. OPPOSITE SUBBARAM MAIN ROAD, KANEKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M L ALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. K.NARSI REDDY The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7220 OF 2019 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent, who is none other than brother of the petitioner is of civil in nature, and they are claiming rights over the disputed house and the writ is filed with false allegations. If the petitioner is aggrieved with the acts of the 4th respondent, he has to approach proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law, and police will not interfere in civil disputes. 3. It appears that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.02.2026 PSK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 61 WRIT PETITION No:7220 OF 2019 Date: 06.02.2026 W PSK