Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19817 (JHR)

SANTOSH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/942/2024 · 2026-07-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20452 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 942 of 2024 ------ Santosh Kumar, aged about 61 years, son of Late Mathura Prasad Agrawal, resident of Madan Mohan Road, Daltonganj, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ms. Shailesh Kumar Mishra, presently holding the post of Registrar, Nilamber Pitamber University, having office at Medininagar, P.O. and P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate Ms. Shivani Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Karamjit S. Chhabra, Advocate Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-I For the University : Mr. Radha Krishan Gupta, Advocate Ms. Pinky Shaw, Advocate Mr. Ankur Kumar, Advocate ------ 02/10.07.2026 It transpires from the show cause that a sum of Rs.20,73,413/- has been calculated by the opposite party and paid to the petitioner. The writ court’s order was to take a decision and if decision is in favour of the petitioner to provide the fruit of that to the petitioner. The petitioner herein is disputing the calculation. It transpires that substantial compliance are there of the order of the writ court and petitioner is still aggrieved. The petitioner is required to get it adjudicated. As such the contempt proceeding is dropped. The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate action under the law. The contempt petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.07.2026 Anit Uploaded 13.07.2026