RAMESHWAR GURJAR S/O DHIRALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2997/2026 · 2026-03-23
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1981 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1981 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12009] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2997/2026 Rameshwar Gurjar S/o Dhiralal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Main Road, Sanvatsar, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nikitha Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Ms. Priyanka Kumawat, Addl-SP SIU CAW, Ajmer Mr. Sanjay, CI-PS- Gandhinagar, Ajmer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 23/03/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.133/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer for offence under Sections 318(2), 316(2), 61(2) and 308(2) of BNS-2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he was working as a Team Leader on behalf of co-accused Dheeraj Gattani and Lokesh Choudhary. He argued that no recovery has been
[2026:RJ-JP:12009] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2997/2026] effected from the possession of the petitioner. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 28.01.2026. Though two cases are registered against the petitioner but he is on bail in both these cases. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rameshwar Gurjar S/o Dhiralal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/39