50 IA 496 OF 2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 50 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10792 OF 2014 LAHU YASHWANT TINGE AND ORS. VERSUS SHRI. SWAMI JAGADGURU SHANKARACHARYA PEETH, KARVEER, KOLHAPUR ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Drupad Patil a/w Mr. Rushabh D. Phade A.G.P. for Respondent/State : Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 20.08.2026 PER COURT : Heard learned counsel Mr. 2. The applicant seeks clarification to the order passed by this Court on 11.12.2014 while admitting the petition, which has led to perpetuation of the confusion. 3. The applicants are occupants of the land in question. Respondent no. 1 is the contesting party, which has set up a rival claims against the applicants. Their names are recorded in mutation entry No. 222, which was directed to be cancelled by impugned judgment and order dated 06.09.2014. The practical difficulty faced by the applicants is that in case of death, their heirs cannot be shown in the record of rights. The revenue officers are not entertaining the application in view of the interim orders passed by this Court on 11.12.2014. 4. The applicants are in occupation of the land. The mutation entry no. 1/2 50 IA 496 OF 2026.odt 222 is in existence, as can be inferred from order dated 11.12.2014. If such is the situation, the heirs of deceased applicants needs to be shown on record. 5. It is clarified that interim orders passed on 11.12.2014 shall not be an impediment for recording heirs of the deceased applicants on record in mutation entry No. 222. The applicants or the heirs shall not claim any equity because of incorporation of the names in the revenue record. The mutation entry and its subsequent changes shall be subject to outcome of the writ petition. 6. Interim Application is disposed of. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 2/2