APHC010172822023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 972/2023 Between: 1. G SATYA ARUNA PRABHA, D/O. G.VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.45/142-203/K2, AMEENA ABBAS NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. U SIVARAMA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O.U.V.RAJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.5.1-15A-18-9A, BABA 13RINDAVAN NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. K VISHWANATH, S/O.K.NARASAPPA, AGED MAJOR, RAJA WINES, R/O. KODUMUR VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. A VINAY KUMAR, S/O.A.KRISHNA MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 45/24-K-45-2A, TEACHERS COLONY, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. POVANAPU SREENIVASULU, S/O.P.BALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT. 44 YEARS, R/O. H.NO, 77-40-8A-18-A, AYYAPPA SWAMY, NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. GOILA CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O.G.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 4-31-9-2, BALAJINAGAR, STANTANPURAM, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. STATE BANK OF INDIA, BUDHAWARAPETA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 7. ANNUM VEERA NAGESWARA REDDY, S/O.ANNUM BALA VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.1-65-C, EELANNAPADU VILLAGE, BANDIATMAKUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobegs to present the above Revision Petition in this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the Order dt.14-03-2023 in I.A.No. 320 of 2021 in O.S.No.29 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge at Kurnool, Kurnool District, IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.29 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge at Kurnool, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the above Revision Petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/defendant No.1 aggrieved by the orders passed in I.A.No.320 of 2021 in O.S.No.29 of 2012 by the learned I Additional District Judge at Kurnool. 2. Sri K.Raghu Ratna Surya, learned counsel representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner, reported that the suit itself has been dismissed and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. 3. Registry has also placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 27.09.2023, the suit was dismissed. 4. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 03rd February, 2026 JLV 4 279 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 972/2023 Date: 03rd February, 2026 JLV