[ 2026:JHHC:20289] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3781 of 2026 Ritesh Kumar @ Monu Verma @ Monu Kumar, aged about 36 years, Sex-Male, S/o Sanjay Kumar Verma, R/o No. QTR No. DT 203T, H.E.C Colony, Sector-9 P.O+P.S- Dhurwa Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand, Aadhar No. 5190 4936 4233. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Sonali Bhattacharjee, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. ------ 04/ 09.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 111(2) and 308 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 25(1-b)(a),26,35 of Arms Act and Section 17 of the CLA Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khunti. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the other co-accused. On this ground, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is the accomplice of other co- accused and allegations are there of realizing the levy money in the name of PLFI organization. On this ground, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. It transpires that the petitioner is the accomplice of other [ 2026:JHHC:20289] -2- co-accused person and allegations are there of realizing the levy amount in the name of PLFI organization. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-09.07.2026 Amitesh/-