Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19800 (KAR)

SMT PUTTALAMMA v. SRI MADAIAH

RSA/797/2018 · 2026-06-05

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27140 RSA No. 797 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 797 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT PUTTALAMMA W/O LATE SRI GARESIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SRI RUDRAIAH S/O LATE SRI GARESIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 3. SRI VEERABHADRAIAH S/O LATE SRI GARESIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 4. SRI CHOWDAIAH S/O LATE SRI GARESIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 5. SRI RAJASHEKHARA S/O LATE SRI GARESIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT SHIMEDAYAPANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562117. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R B SADASIVAPPA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27140 RSA No. 797 of 2018 AND: 1. SRI MADAIAH S/O LATE SRI MUNIYAIAH AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, 2. SRI MAHADEVAIAH S/O LATE SRI MUNIYAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NANJAPURA VILLAGE KAILANCHA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-571511. 3. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA-571511. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAVEEN REDDY M V.,ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 29.11.2017, PASSED IN R.A.NO. 49/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 26.06.2014, PASSED IN OS.NO.449/2008, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., RAMANAGARA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27140 RSA No. 797 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Memo of retirement filed on behalf of the appellants with no objection certificate issued to the appellants. 2. Appellants are called out. They are absent and have not chosen to engage any other advocate. As such, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18