Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 198 (KAR)

SRI. RAJENDRA S/O. BANDUJI PATIL v. THE STATE

CRL.P/100382/2022 · 2026-02-09

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1871 CRL.P No. 100382 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100382 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAJENDRA S/O. BANDUJI PATIL AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. OM SAI DATTA NAGAR, VISHRAMBAGH, SANGLI, SANGLI TALUK AND DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA-416416. 2. SRI. ARUN S/O. BANDU HAWALDAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE, WARD NO.2, MUDHOL, MUDHOL TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587313. 3. SRI. SUDHIR S/O. ARUN HAWALDAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE, WARD NO.2, MUDHOL, MUDHOL TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587313. 4. SRI. ABHIJEET S/O. DINAKAR SADAWARTE, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE, R/AT. SOLANKURE GALLI, AKKOL, NIPPANI TALUK, BELGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 5. SRI SHASHIKANT SHANKAR HAWALDAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCU. PRIVATE SERVICE R/O. SAI NAGAR, MUDHOL TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587313. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.11 15:04:04 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1871 CRL.P No. 100382 of 2022 6. SRI. SANDEEP S/O. ARUN HAWALDAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS, WARD NO.5, NEAR BHATGADDIMAT, MUDHOL TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587313. 7. SRI. SHANKAR HANUMANTH HAWALDAR S/O. HANUMANTH HAWALDAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCCU. AGRICULTURE, R/O SAI NAGAR, MUDHOL TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587313. 8. SRI. RAHULSINH RAJENDRA PATIL S/O. RAJENDRA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O. OM SAI DATTA NAGAR, VISHRAMBAGH, SANGLI, SANGLI TALUK AND DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA-416416. 9. SRI. VIJAY MERCHANT SANKAPAL, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCCU. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/AT. POST UDUPADI, RAMDURG TALUK, BELGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 10. SRI RAVI S. JADHAV, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/AT. BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 11. SRI SHIVANANDAIAH MADIWALAYYA KALMATH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/AT. HARUGOPPA, BAILHONGAL TALUK, BELGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 12. SRI IRANNA KEMPANNA HUGAR S/O. KEMPANNA HUGAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE BUSINESS, R/AT. AVARGOL, HUKKERI TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 13. SRI. VEERABHADRAPPA BALAPPA AMMANAGI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1871 CRL.P No. 100382 of 2022 OCC. PRIVATE SERVICES R/AT. NANDAGAON, GOKAK TALUK BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 14. SRI IRANNA I. TIGADI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE R/AT. BAILUR, KITTUR TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590001. 15. SRI. MAHADEV SINGAPPA KADROLLI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC.PRIVATE SERVICE, R/AT. VEERAPUR, SAMPAGAON POST, BAILHONGAL TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.S. SHETTAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. 2. SRI. SANGAPPA S/O. SHIVASANGAPPA KAKKANAMELI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS R/AT. WARD NO.10, BAGALKOT BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587313. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS RELATING TO FIR IN CRIME NO.009/2020 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JMFC COURT, RAMDURG, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, AND QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.009/2020, OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 143, 147, 323, 406, 409, 420, 504, 506, 149 OF IPC 1860, ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JMFC COURT, RAMDURG, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREON, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND QUASH THE COMPLAINT OF 2 ND RESPONDENT DATED 14.01.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-B IN CRIME NO.009/2020 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JMFC COURT, RAMDURG, BELAGAVI DISTRICT. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1871 CRL.P No. 100382 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/-CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 86