GHULAM AHMED AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECETARY POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(Crl)/14/2026 · 2026-03-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 198 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 198 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(Crl) No. 14/2026 CM No. 1189/2023
Ghulam Ahmed & Anr …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Arshid Pervaiz Malik, Advocate
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (02.03.2026)
01. After arguing for a while, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners when confronted with the maintainability of the petition, seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with a liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law.
02. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
02.03.2026
Vijay
S. No. 133 Vijay Kumar 2026.02.09 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document