[2026:RJ-JP:1644] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17799/2025 Om Singh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jeeli, Sujangarh, Churu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Rajsthan, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005. 2. Transport Commissioner, office of the Transport Commissioner, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302001. 3. District Transport Officer (Enforcement), E-Detection Cell, Office of the Transport Department, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302004. 4. Regional Transport Authority, District Sikar. 5. District Transport Officer, Sujangarh, District Churu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Shankar with Mr. Devendra Raj Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Divyanshu Gupta, AGC with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 15/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition and further be pleased to: i) Issue an appropriate writ of certiorari or any other writ order, or direction to quash/cancel the multiple e-challans issued against the petitioner's vehicle RJ31-GA-8067 between 29.07.2025 to 10.09.2025 by the respondents; ii) Direct the respondents to update the system records to reflect valid Insurance Certificate and PUCC for the said vehicle; iii) Direct the respondents to refrain from issuing further challans without verification of valid documents from the Vahan database; iv) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if: the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the [2026:RJ-JP:1644] (2 of 2) [CW-17799/2025] respondent No.3-District Transport Officer (Enforcement), E- Detection Cell, Office of the Transport Department encapsulating the grievance(s) raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction may be issued to respondent No.3 to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Heard. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent No.3 within a period of two (2) weeks from today. The respondent No.3 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with the law after providing a personal hearing to the petitioner. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-20