Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19797 (JHR)

ROSHAN KARMALI ALIAS ROHAN KARMALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5450/2026 · 2026-07-08

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:20151 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5450 of 2026 Roshan Karmali @Rohan Karmali, aged 27 years, S/o Shiv Charan Karmali, R/o Village- Hakedag, PO and PS- Silli, District- Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, APP --- 06/08.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026 in connection with Silli P.S. Case No.11 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 115 (2), 126 (2), 127 (2), 352, 315 (2), 74, 76, 79 of the B.N.S. 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned SDJM, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026 and the charge-sheet has already been submitted and further, charges have also been framed. 4. He submits that as per the allegation, there was an attempt to commit rape upon the victim in her house. 5. Learned counsel has further submitted that statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, 2023 has been placed wherein she has stated that the petitioner asked her sister to go out with another girl and in the meantime, petitioner disrobed the victim and when she raised alarm, the petitioner ran away from the place of occurrence. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. However, the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner have not been disputed. 7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering that the charge has already been framed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the ( 2026:JHHC:20151 ) 2 satisfaction of learned SDJM, Ranchi in connection with Silli P.S. Case No.11 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 10. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 08.07.2026 Uploaded 11.07.2026 sandeep/